By | January 2, 2019


Keeping OLF at Bay from Conventional Politics: The Purpose, Modus Operandi and Repercussions

Belligerent PM Dr. Abiy Ahmed, with the advice of Lema Megersa and his company, boasted to disarm OLF Army, while he is losing control over Tigray, Amhara and Ogaden regions. This is a sufficient signal for a looming fragmentation of the country. It is time for PM Abiy to call, putting down his war-mongering attitude in Oromia, for national dialogue to save the country.

By Jabessa Gurmessa Mullata, January 2, 2019

  1. The Security Problem in Oromia as a Prelude

The Situation in Oromia, particularly in Guji and Wollega, right now is excruciating; we are grappling with security problems as a result of armed conflict between OLF and the defense force of the government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE). Government soldiers are directly and deliberately targeting helpless and hapless civilians who have no participation in the armed struggle. For instance, on December 28, 2018 alone, the government armed men massacred more than 30 civilians in Guji and Gulliso. Killings by security forces have also been reported from Nekemte, Gimbi, Najjo, Lalo-Kile, and many other towns/villages. Moreover, the military has been turning down properties such as homes and crops into ashes; they are destroying civilian property in a situation when it is not ‘rendered absolutely necessary by military operations’. The primary purpose of such measures is to spread terror among civilian population and to break the morale of the community. It is with a view to force the communities in this area to desist and refrain from lending any kind of support to the liberation fighters.

There seems to be a consensus among the general public that the cause of the ongoing conflict is the failure to implement the ‘Asmara Convention’ that was signed between OLF and the government of Ethiopia. However, there is a disagreement as to who is to be blamed. In this respect, some critics point their fingers to both the OLF and the government; they argue that both OLF and the Ethiopian government equally share the blame for the security problem. On the other hand, there are individuals who argue that it is OLF that has to be solely blamed. They claim that OLF should be legally held responsible for not immediately and unconditionally laying down arms. In an attempt to corroborate their stance, they tell you that there cannot be two forces that have a monopoly over violence in a single polity. This is true, at least, in principle; but, pragmatically speaking, it does not sound tenable. In other words, this line of argument is too simplistic and as a result it cannot hold water. It cannot withstand the slightest of scrutiny. The proponents of the argument get tight lipped when you press and ask them whether the government is doing enough so that the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA), the military wing of OLF, generate and maintain the political will to restore the state’s monopoly over the use of force and participate in the ongoing transition wholeheartedly.

Most of the individuals that put the blame at the door of OLF, not to mention those shroud individuals who are engaged in a conspiracy, are naïve, uninformed and gullible; they are those who have not understood the covert intention of Oromo Democratic Party (ODP). This writer believes that the source of the current problem is ODP’s desire to hamper OLF from undergoing a successful shift from armed insurrection to post-war conventional politics. In other words, ODP does not want to see the return of OLF to channels of democratic politics. There are ample signals that indicate that ODP won’t be happy even if OLA decides to immediately and unconditionally lay down arm and engage in non-armed political struggle; they have a problem from visions of the front regardless of the means and methods through which the vision and goals are pursued.

This is puzzling and perplexing given the fact there was a spirit of fraternity between the leaders of the two organizations during the conclusion of the ‘Asmara Convention’. This puzzle needs to be untangled and that is what this piece aims to do. Specifically, the paper seeks to explore the factors that underlie ODP’s reneging of its promises and desire to keep OLF at bay from conventional post-war politics. And, as well, it will highlight the manifestations of this covert intention of ODP.

  1. The Desire to Cling to State Power Beyond 2020

ODP aims to stay on power beyond 2020. For this purpose it has to do two essential activities. The first one is embarking upon a systematic campaign, and the other is derailing OLF’s effort to shift from violent to peaceful politics. ODP is almost certain that it cannot beat OLF in a free and competitive election provided that there is a level playing field. A glance at the history some of the former rebel organizations in other countries substantiates ODP’s fear, concern and worry. Resistance and liberation movements that had transformed themselves into a non-violent legal body by denouncing the use of force have acquired state power in a number of countries. Typical example of this are GAM in Aceh and CPN-M in Nepal which have been heading government in their respective countries in the years that followed their successful transition from war to channels of democratic politics.

It is important to note once the OLF fully transforms itself, it can easily form an alliance with the other opposition parties. This is the demand of the Oromo mass; from Dire Dawa to Dambi Dollo the Oromo people have been calling for the creation of a unity between OFC and OLF. If the opposition camp gets coalesced, it will be almost certain that ODP will lose in the upcoming election provided that the election will be free, fair and competitive. However, the issue of OLA is a bottle-neck in this regard. OLF is still a politico-military organization and as result it would be difficult for OFC to collaboratively work with OLF. Thus, one can safely conclude that ODP is proactively working to hinder the creation of a unity among Oromo political parties.

There are three specific reasons why ODP does not want this. The first is fear of prosecution if they lose in election. Most of the cadres, particularly the clique in the party, are implicated in a number of crimes ranging from corruption to egregious violation of human rights and they will most probably be prosecuted and brought to justice by a party that acquires a state power in Oromia/Ethiopia. This will definitely happen unless the political elites reach a consensus ‘to look ahead and not rake over the past’; the Spanish did the same thing through what was known as ‘pacto de olvedo’ – literally, ‘Pact of Forgetting’. And, this scares the cabal within ODP more than anybody else. On top of this, though not explicit, it seems that ODP is trying to depict itself as if it is building a multi-national (none)democratic polity where the Oromo dominate political process by controlling state institutions and policies so as to promote its interests more or less exclusively. The crux of the matter is that challenging and or replacing ODP by another party at a federal level at this early time might result in losing the control over state institutions and policies that the ‘Oromo’ currently have. So, election that is competitive among the Oromo forces is more or less a setback. This view is not only simplistic but also implausible since controlling state institutions and policies at the Federal level is not the only and ultimate goal of the Oromo struggle. This is not even one among the irreducible Oromo demands. The last but the most important reason why ODP wants to keep OLF at bay from conventional politics is related to vision of the front. They fear that OLF might work towards the disintegration of Ethiopia either through peaceful negotiations or use of force in case it acquires state power; i.e., acquiring state power will put the front to aggressively pursue a separatist agenda.

  1. ODP’s Problematic Political Stance and Approach

Owing to the aforementioned reasons ODP wants to keep OLF at bay from conventional politics. To this end, it is tirelessly and strategically working to portray OLF as ‘bothersome spoiler’ that must to be fought and defeated/eliminated or at least pacified through a superficial DDR rather than as agents who can play a constructive role in securing peace and building more legitimate state. This is a covert policy aimed at liberating Oromia from the ‘bothersome spoiler’ OLF unchallenged by the vast majority of the Oromo people.

This propensity of viewing, and making others perceive, OLA as ‘mere recipients of reintegration assistance’ or spoilers that must be disarmed and demobilized as quickly as possible rather than recognizing them as peace building partners is one of the reasons why the government is not willing to genuinely implement a DDR in its literal and real sense let alone embarking upon a holistic ‘security transition’. The government’s readiness to comply with the main objectives and principles underlying the international DDR policy documents such as the United Nations Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards (UNIDDRS) and Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (SIDDR) is questionable. Also, the issue of ‘security transition’ is conspicuously absent from their narrative.

The government led by ODP wants an imminent total disarmament of OLA without any precondition. ODP cadres are asking OLA to lay down arms and/or hand over its arms to the Ethiopian security forces. This is tantamount to requesting OLA to surrender. Though the need for quick disarmament, demobilization and dismantling of rebel armies after cessation of hostilities is understandable, one has to be cautious about his/her approaches in this regard. And, requesting surrender or something of its equivalence is a dangerous move and approach that is clearly jettisoned not only by rebels but also by the international experts in the field. Therefore, this approach must be avoided as it implies a winner loser scenario. This is what the Chairman of OLF, Dawud Ibsa, and other senior officials have been reiterating time and again in the interviews they have been giving to various Television channels.

The OLF leadership, of course, is not only rejecting this winner-loser scenario but it is also demanding security sector reform. This is a call for the transformation of the structures of oppression and inequality that forced OLF to take up arms and resort to violence. Establishing a legitimate security sector through a reform is at the core of any peace building process; this polity needs to have a security sector that can ‘distinguish between service to the state and service to a particular government’. On top of this, it has to be noted that a source of threat to security in a particular state is not only the non-state armed groups; government forces are implicated in security problems on a number of occasions. Thus, ‘it takes the two to transform the current situation towards a sustainable peace and democracy. Moreover, the demand for comprehensive security sector reform is legitimate demand as far as the reason d’être for taking up arms, i.e., the fact that the Ethiopian military has been one of the instrument being employed by the successive regimes for brutalizing and silencing the Oromo throughout its history, is still valid. Requiring OLA to lay down arms as quickly as possible, while keeping the government security sector intact, creates a feeling of unfairness and imbalance. It amounts to putting the cart before the horse.

  1. What Other Wicked Measures Can ODP Possibly Take?

The call from the leadership of OLF is, however, falling on deaf ears. Rather than positively responding to the call, the government, spearheaded by ODP, seems to have been readying itself to take further ill-intentioned measures subsequent to effectively aborting efforts aimed at meaningful security transition. Most of the repressive measures that are being taken against OLF and its members/supporters are akin to those of the early 1990s in their nature and intended goals. Specifically, ODP will resort to robust application of the criminal law against members/supporters of OLF; embark on powerful but slow mobilization of political parties, the larger Oromo community including the Diaspora and civil societies against OLF and delegitimize the existence of non-state armed groups and eventually get OLF back onto a terrorist list.

The most dangerous move, however, could be breaking the chain of command and erasing of ‘oaths of obligation’ between the political wing and military wing of the front. Thus, it’s vital for the OLF to retain full control over its structures and chain of commands.

We have been observing the symptoms of all these wicked measures over the past few weeks. The persecution of members, supporters and sympathizers of OLF, for instance, is already underway. The closing of office, and pillage under the pretext of an assault on OLA are being reported. These measures are expected to be intensified in days and weeks to come. This is worrying given the fact that there is no hurdle that can stop ODP from intensifying the measures. It has to, however, be noted that whatever self-centered measures ODP might take to get upper-hand over the OLF in the Ethiopian political arena is not good for the Oromo cause. It impedes the chance of offering constructive political alternatives to the use of force and eventually turns some of areas where OLA is active into a war zone.

Conclusion and the Way Forward

The transition in Ethiopia has now reached a dangerous climax. And, if things continue the way are at the moment, the country is going to fall either under the dictatorship of a ‘military man or, in the worst scenario, under a ‘military dictatorship’. But whether the country falls under dictatorship of a ‘military man or under a ‘military dictatorship’, it is going to be neither stable nor peaceful; anarchy might prevail. This might, in turn, entail the killing, starvation, and fleeing of thousands civilians.

Hence, the government has to be stopped from its reckless measures that are provocative enough to lead to armed conflict with OLA and at the same time the rebels, particularly OLA, have to be encouraged to lay down arms in a manner that conforms with the standards and practices provided under the international DDR policy documents such as the United Nations Integrated Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Standards (UNIDDRS) and Stockholm Initiative on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (SIDDR). In addition to this, it is vital to establish an inclusive political system in which the opposition can meaningfully participate and contribute to the transition. The government must heed oppositions’ stance regarding transition; if the current leadership has the determination and political willingness of building a democratic polity; they should not do it alone.

The general public is expected to exert pressure, in a concerted manner, on the government in this respect. Otherwise, it is going to lose the victory achieved through bitter struggle.

Victory to the Oppressed People!

January 1st, 2019 G.C
Oromia.

9 thoughts on “Keeping OLF at Bay from Conventional Politics: The Purpose, Modus Operandi and Repercussions

  1. Taddesse Challa

    The security Situation in Oromia, right now is a result of armed conflict between OLF and the defence force of the government of Ethiopia. OLF soldiers are directly and deliberately targeting helpless civilians who have no participation in the armed struggle only because of theirs ethnicity.

    There seems in the general public including extreme Oromo elite that the cause of the ongoing conflict is the failure to implement the ‘Asmara Convention’ by OLF, OLF is terrorising the public at large and should be legally held responsible for not immediately and unconditionally laying down arm.

    OLF should maintain the political will rather use of force and participate in the ongoing transition wholeheartedly.

    Ethiopian security force is under ongoing reform to serve all Ethiopians, OLF leadership, of course, should embrace this rather rejecting this winner-loser scenario. On top of this, it has to be noted that a source of threat to security in Ethiopia are non-state armed groups; Thus, ‘ OLF to transform the current situation towards a sustainable peace and democracy by laying down arms.

    The admin for this publication should exercise in promoting peace and democracy for all Ethiopians to live in peace and harmony rather creating divisions, violence and anarchy just only to satisfy a certain groups.

    Peace, Democracy and victory for all Ethiopians

    Reply
  2. chala abdissa

    This article is really an eye opening to the blind narrow minded,power hunger government. At first place, it is OLF who has been fighting this dictator regime since last 28 years. It is OLF and OLA who sticked to the path of justice for the people. OLF is the only power which held this country together. No powerful nation like in Oromo who has the capacity to keep ethiopia in peace track andd at the same time no other power than Oromo to make ethiopia a hell. The Oromo peopl and OLF have had imeasurabe tolerance to push this countries politics in line of peace and democracy despite their suffering(death,tortures,kidnappings,exploitation and long lasting marginalization). Mostly the westerns have manuplated the peope’s revolution and has changed its track once again. But for any body, whether internal or external force, who wishes to see ethiopia in a democratic and peaceful situation has to think again. Unless OLF is handled well and involved in this transition process, the so called ethiopia will remain history.

    Reply
  3. meseret T

    Better to send this article to Dr.Abiy and other international community. Dr.Abiy may destroy OLF and OLA, but he should bear in mind that he destroyes ethiopia the same day. OLF is the only political organization which fought with out any foriegn support in totally impossible political geography for morethan 40 years. yet it has never vanished. rather every time conspiracy is implemented on it, it grows more and more. For any group who wants ethiopia sustain, not to understand what type of force OLF is a pity. For someone who is really mature politically, OLF is the biggest fortune to keep ethiopia in place. The lost and tragic 28yrs passed was due to marginalization of OLF for the sake of power monopoly. Dr.Abiy also could not get rid of that bad infection which he was injected for the last 27 years.

    Reply
  4. Hawwan

    Tadesse challa, what benefits ethiopia is not writing the reverse of facts. Rather it is accepting facts and trying to go forward for the solution. OLF you claim as a criminal is in the heart of every 40-50 million Oromos. have you ever seen 5-7 million people in Addis being gathered to welcome any group in ethiopian hstory? If such flood of people are behind OLF(remeber OLF was not having any political power when this happen), how can you think avoiding OLF possible? you mean avoidnig the whole Oromos from ethiopian land? weack argument, senseless. what I fear is that if this OPDO group tries to eliminate OLF, definitely every corner of Oromia will have its own war lords. the country will remain in an irreversable civil war. to the worrest, even terrorist acts. because the generation on the ground are not like you and other dull minded people think. they will never accept all the injustice the next round with new faces and new names called abiy or lemma.

    Reply
  5. Sagni Guyassa

    Obviously, Tadesse Challa is not an Oromo except for his name. Or at best, he is one of the numerous OPDOs who are willing to sell their sisters let alone Oromo for their personal gains.

    Reply
  6. Chaltuu T

    It would have been much better if all open minded people have a manner to put theirs idea without creating a one sided opinion by accommodating a platform for all, I have no any problem who ever party get into power as long as fair and equal representation for all Ethiopians. Hawwan seems not interested to hear or read any criticism towards OLF, rather promoting and encouraging irreversible civil war. that is an extreme view and advise you to be a grown and & responsible person.
    your view does not represent fair minded Oromo peoples who would like to see flourished democracy to all Ethiopians.
    For all Ethiopians, whether internal or external force, who wishes to see Ethiopia in a democratic and peaceful situation has to be involved in this transition process.

    Reply
  7. Hawwan

    Dear Chaltu T( it seems you r chaltu Tadesse!)
    Anyway, the whole content of the article and what i mentioned is same with your idea. We need fair and equal representation. Though we say it, for the last 150 yrs no one has bleeded like Oromo. This time also, it is no one else but oromo children’s blood which brought the so called Abiy’s era. So, do you mean that all Ethiopians are equally represented while hundreds of thousands of Oromos being slaughtered , displaced, raped, and tourtured? Do you say that Abiy is different from TPLF while ordering uncountable military force on innocent Oromos and killing them in their hut house, burning their harvest, dragging their dwad body on the streets, and kidnapping hundreds? Is that democracy to abuse OLF, it close and rob its offices, and trying to eliminate OLF only for the sake of sustaining power? Do you want to convience me with out any single truth??? What it mean by democracy for ethiopians? Are Oromos not ethiopian? Or do you think Oromos do not loss hope if hope of democracy is once again vanished? If there is no hope for democracy , frustration and hoplessness definitely will lead to endless civil war. Rather we need to tell selfish power hunger individuals. They will never escape acciuntability. This bitter fact which we all need to swallow. Tell them, tell all concerned stakeholders than defending full blown dectator.

    Reply
  8. Sentayehu m

    This article tells tip of the iceberg. The worst is yet to come. Abiy and EPRDF have been acquinted with murder. Abiy himsef has no any moral ground to accuse Getacho Asefa, former intellihency chief. Because, Abiy was the one who was purposely educated encryption, established spying center, spied all information through internets and telephones, and fed Getachew Asefa with analysed datas. Getachew did nothing without Abiy. But now he came to accused Getachew as if he was innocent yesterday and innocent tomorrow. It seems foolishness to expect Abiy to bring democracy to erhiopians. The Western countries also are the ones who synthesized these all conspiracies on the struggle of Oromos. But i am sure that none of them will succeed. Better if they think twice before it becomes late. Lastly i have a message for the readers of this article. There are 150,000 people trained and employeed individuals by OPDO just to neutraize any social media opinions which can reveal their crime. So, do not follow comments but read the content and analyse the fact on ground. Let them hire million propogandists, with out all inclusive and democratic path, we all are to see the end of ethiopia.

    Reply
  9. Taddesse Challa

    Sagni Guyassa, what a narrow minded person!, Do I have to be only OROMO to comment on Ethiopian politics? Is that what you read? I believe” or understand as a concerned stakeholders in Ethiopian politics.

    You can call me anything but obviously I wouldn’t be offended by someone like you with no outward looking.

    Something is happening under new prime minister, authoritarianism and state brutality appear to be giving way to something resembling democracy. It is now being lauded as a model for the region.
    But it is also a time of deep anxiety. There are OLD guards opposing and creating ethnic conflict by an upsurge in ethnic violence and widespread lawlessness. Hate speech thrives on social media.

    The roadmap must focus on addressing the immediate emergency situation, creating secure and stable conditions to ensure the rights of all citizens, and allowing the stakeholders’ reasonable participation in reforming institutions and paving the way for a free and fair election.

    This transitional period is a critical time to produce a transitional pact with major stakeholders and lay the foundation for a reasonably stable constitutional democracy, institutionalized through free and fair elections.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.