By | July 13, 2018


The United States and China in Africa: What Does the Data Say?

The brief provides three policy recommendations for collaboration between the United States and China in Africa: the U.S. and China should do more to work together in developing African roads, railroads, airports, and harbors

WASHINGTON D.C., United States of America, July 13, 2018/ — The United States and China in Africa: What Does the Data Say?:

How does the United States differ from China in its engagement with Africa? A policy brief (https://goo.gl/4tGLWv) released in April 2017 by the China-Africa Research Initiative (CARI) (http://www.sais-cari.org/) at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) answers this question, using analysis from its original data on Chinese and U.S. trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), and loans to Africa over the past 15 years.

The authors find that Chinese engagement emphasizes Africa’s infrastructure needs; key countries are consistently top destinations for different types of economic activities including Nigeria, South Africa, and Algeria; and falling commodity prices are responsible for declining U.S. and Chinese engagement in Africa.

The brief provides three policy recommendations for collaboration between the United States and China in Africa: the U.S. and China should do more to work together in developing African roads, railroads, airports, and harbors; the U.S. and China should coordinate engagement that cuts across trade, FDI, and loan finance in Africa; the U.S. and China should diversify away from resource-rich sectors and focus on other growing African industries, such as manufacturing.

Key findings include:

  • The value of African oil exports to China decreased by 50% from $53.1 billion in 2014 to $27.5 billion in 2015.
  • In 2008, oil accounted for 85% of U.S. imports from Africa, but by 2015, oil was only 40% of imports.
  • As a proportion of global FDI stock, China’s investment in Africa made up 3.7% in 2015, larger than that of the United States, where Africa constituted only 1.4%.
  • From 2000 to 2015, China Eximbank contributed $63 billion of loans to Africa while the U.S. Eximbank contributed only $1.7 billion. China Eximbank contributed to almost all 54 African countries, while U.S. Eximbank contributed to only five.
  • Transportation is the top destination for China Eximbank loans to Africa, while energy and mining is the top destination for U.S. Eximbank loans to Africa.

The authors are available to further discuss how oil exports influence Chinese and U.S. trade relations with Africa, why Chinese and U.S. firms favor investment in different African industries, and what are the main sectors to which China and the United States provide loans in Africa?

Read more: The United States and China in Africa: What Does the Data Say?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.